Предмет злочину, передбаченого статтею 298 КК України: проблеми визначення
Вантажиться...
Дата
2020
Науковий керівник
Укладач
Редактор
Назва журналу
ISSN
E-ISSN
Назва тому
Видавець
Одеський національний університет імені І. І. Мечникова
Анотація
Стаття присвячена дослідженню визначення об’єктів підводної культурної спадщини як предмет злочину, передбаченого статтею 298 КК України. Здійснено огляд сучасних проблем кваліфікації цього злочину проти моральності. Робиться висновок про
необхідність удосконалення кримінального законодавства України та судової практики
щодо знищення, руйнування або пошкодження об’єктів підводної культурної спадщини.
Статья посвящена исследованию определения объектов подводного культурного наследия как предмет преступления, предусмотренного статьей 298 УК Украины. Осуществлен обзор современных проблем квалификации этого преступления против нравственности. Делается вывод о необходимости совершенствования уголовного законодательства Украины и судебной практики по уничтожению, разрушению или повреждению объектов подводного культурного наследия.
The article is devoted to the study of the definition of objects of underwater cultural heritage as an offense under article 298 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. A review of current issues of qualification of this crime against morality is carried out. The conclusion is drawn on the need to improve the criminal legislation of Ukraine and judicial practice on the destruction, destruction or damage of underwater cultural heritage objects. The Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage was ratified by the Law of Ukraine «On Ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage» of September 20, 2006, and this demonstrated that the issue of ownership of the wreck and property is the main issue in preserving the underwater cultural heritage, what is on it. The document reflects that any dispute between two or more participating States is to be settled through negotiations in good faith or other peaceful means of their choice. However, despite some advances in the provisions for the protection and preservation of the underwater cultural heritage, some of the language of the Convention is incorrect. Difficulties in identifying objects of underwater cultural heritage as objects of crime under Article 298 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine are aggravated by the fact that in 2018 amendments to the Law of Ukraine on the Protection of Cultural Heritage were introduced. These changes exacerbate the problems of uncertainty in determining the objects of underwater cultural heritage, which makes it difficult to comply with the principles enshrined in the Convention for the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage, creates the basis for erroneous qualifications in cases under Article 298 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and, in the end, has negative consequences for the cultural heritage Ukraine.
Статья посвящена исследованию определения объектов подводного культурного наследия как предмет преступления, предусмотренного статьей 298 УК Украины. Осуществлен обзор современных проблем квалификации этого преступления против нравственности. Делается вывод о необходимости совершенствования уголовного законодательства Украины и судебной практики по уничтожению, разрушению или повреждению объектов подводного культурного наследия.
The article is devoted to the study of the definition of objects of underwater cultural heritage as an offense under article 298 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. A review of current issues of qualification of this crime against morality is carried out. The conclusion is drawn on the need to improve the criminal legislation of Ukraine and judicial practice on the destruction, destruction or damage of underwater cultural heritage objects. The Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage was ratified by the Law of Ukraine «On Ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage» of September 20, 2006, and this demonstrated that the issue of ownership of the wreck and property is the main issue in preserving the underwater cultural heritage, what is on it. The document reflects that any dispute between two or more participating States is to be settled through negotiations in good faith or other peaceful means of their choice. However, despite some advances in the provisions for the protection and preservation of the underwater cultural heritage, some of the language of the Convention is incorrect. Difficulties in identifying objects of underwater cultural heritage as objects of crime under Article 298 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine are aggravated by the fact that in 2018 amendments to the Law of Ukraine on the Protection of Cultural Heritage were introduced. These changes exacerbate the problems of uncertainty in determining the objects of underwater cultural heritage, which makes it difficult to comply with the principles enshrined in the Convention for the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage, creates the basis for erroneous qualifications in cases under Article 298 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and, in the end, has negative consequences for the cultural heritage Ukraine.
Опис
Ключові слова
кримінальне право, злочини проти моральності, предмет злочину, підводна культурна спадщина, уголовное право, преступления против нравственности, предмет преступление, подводное культурное наследие, criminal law, crimes against morality, subject of crime, underwater cultural heritage, criminal law, crimes against morality, subject of crime, underwater cultural heritage
Бібліографічний опис
Правова держава = Правовое государство = Сonstitutional State