Лінгво-просодичні засоби актуалізації ввічливості/неввічливості в англомовному неформальному конфліктному діалогічному дискурсі
Вантажиться...
Дата
2022
Науковий керівник
Укладач
Редактор
Назва журналу
ISSN
E-ISSN
Назва тому
Видавець
Одеський національний університет імені І. І. Мечникова
Анотація
Статтю присвячено аналізу лінгво-просодичних засобів реалізації ввічливості/
неввічливості в неформальних конфліктних діалогах, дібраних із саундтреків до
4 сучасних англомовних фільмів методом суцільної вибірки. Основними критеріями класифікації фактичного матеріалу дослідження є 1) ступінь формальності
відносин між комунікантами і 2) ввічливість/неввічливість. Згідно з цими критеріями досліджувані діалогічні єдності класифікувалися як неформальні ввічливі і неформальні неввічливі. У статті розглянуто функціонування просодії як
засобу реалізації ввічливості/неввічливості в конфліктному дискурсі залежно від
ступеня його формальності, що увиразнює загальну актуальність теми. Метою
даної роботи є вивчення лінгвістичних засобів реалізації ввічливості в англомовному неформальному конфліктному діалогічному дискурсі. З одного боку, неформальна обстановка дає повну свободу вибору емоцій та їхньої реалізації, а з іншого — бажання бути ввічливим і не образити комунікативного партнера (близьку
людину) змушує комунікантів стримувати свої негативні почуття у ввічливому
неформальному конфліктному спілкуванні. Неввічливий неформальний конфлікт
є емоційним та неконтрольованим. Експресивність та неконтрольованість неввічливого неформального конфлікту зумовлені неофіційністю обстановки, небажанням та відсутністю необхідності стримуватися, повною свободою вибору
вербальних та невербальних засобів реалізації конфлікту. Проведене дослідження
дозволило зробити наступні висновки: неформальному конфліктному діалогічному спілкуванню властиве використання тактик вербальної агресії, вживання
заниженої, іноді навіть табуйованою, лексики; простих синтаксичних конструкцій; еліпсиса; прямих наказових конструкцій. На просодичному рівні такі
діалоги характеризуться прискореним темпом (в деяких випадках з тенденцією
до нормального), високою гучністю, широким висотним діапазоном, вживанням
низхідної шкали з перерваною послідовністю і високого низхідного ядерного тону.
Поведінка комунікантів під час конфліктної взаємодії багато в чому залежить
від їхнього соціального статусу, виховання, ввічливості й тактовності.
The immediate aim of the article is to define linguo-prosodic means of politeness/impoliteness realization in English informal conflict dialogiсal discourse. The article examines the functioning of prosody as a means of implementing politeness/ impoliteness in conflict discourse depending on the degree of its formality, which highlights the general relevance of the topic. The analysed informal conflict dialogical units were subdivided into polite and impolite. Thus, in this work we investigate 2 types of informal conflict dialogical units: polite informal and impolite informal. The basic type of informal conflict situations, touching collucutors’ personal life, their family relations, is a family conflict, developing in three major directions: parents — children; husband — wife; brother/sister — brother/sister. Conflicts between family members can take different scenarios depending on inner family relations of conflicting sides. Most frequently conflicts occur between children and parents and between married couples. The main purpose of parents is to make their children change direction of their actions according to their (parents’) ideas and interests. Parents do their best to save asymmetrical correlation of their role and their children’s role within a family, as such placing of roles gives them advantage in realization of their aims. Parents make ample use of orders, prohibitions, threats, reproaches, etc. Children’s communicative strategy in such conflict situations is conditioned by a strong desire to make their family role as important as their parents’ one. The most frequent conflict reasons within a family is violation of both family and social obligations by one or both partners. The most frequent reason of conflict in siblings’ relations is their struggle for personal interests or space; envy; one of the conflict-creating factors is their desire to prove their social importance to each other. On the whole, in impolite informal conflict intercourse the conduct of spouses depends a great deal on their social status and education. Low social status married couples in most cases do not control their emotions, do not think about the conflict consequences, do not try to keep a wife (husband) away from undesirable stresses. In some occasions high social status married couples were characteristic of arrogance, snobbery, scorn, that resulted in aggressive verbal conduct during a conflict. Impolite informal conflict cooperation between brothers and sisters is also characteristic of high emotionality degree. Collocutors do not hide their negative feelings and emotions, are not afraid to talk unpleasant, rough and abusive things. At prosodic level it is expressed by high volume and quick speech tempo, as communication participants speak very quickly; although their speech slows down on semantically and emphatically important areas of the dialogue, i. e. semantically and emphatically important remarks are foregrounded via their prolonging. The conducted research enabled the followings conclusions: English informal conflict dialogiсal discourse is characteristic of using verbal aggression techniques; foul, sometimes even taboo, language; simple syntactic constructions; ellipsis; direct imperative constructions. At prosodic level distinctive features of informal conflict dialogues can be named rapid tempo (often with a tendency to normal), high volume, wide voice range, use of the broken descending scale and the high-falling nuclear tone. The collocutor’s conduct in conflict communication depends a great deal on their social status, education and politeness.
The immediate aim of the article is to define linguo-prosodic means of politeness/impoliteness realization in English informal conflict dialogiсal discourse. The article examines the functioning of prosody as a means of implementing politeness/ impoliteness in conflict discourse depending on the degree of its formality, which highlights the general relevance of the topic. The analysed informal conflict dialogical units were subdivided into polite and impolite. Thus, in this work we investigate 2 types of informal conflict dialogical units: polite informal and impolite informal. The basic type of informal conflict situations, touching collucutors’ personal life, their family relations, is a family conflict, developing in three major directions: parents — children; husband — wife; brother/sister — brother/sister. Conflicts between family members can take different scenarios depending on inner family relations of conflicting sides. Most frequently conflicts occur between children and parents and between married couples. The main purpose of parents is to make their children change direction of their actions according to their (parents’) ideas and interests. Parents do their best to save asymmetrical correlation of their role and their children’s role within a family, as such placing of roles gives them advantage in realization of their aims. Parents make ample use of orders, prohibitions, threats, reproaches, etc. Children’s communicative strategy in such conflict situations is conditioned by a strong desire to make their family role as important as their parents’ one. The most frequent conflict reasons within a family is violation of both family and social obligations by one or both partners. The most frequent reason of conflict in siblings’ relations is their struggle for personal interests or space; envy; one of the conflict-creating factors is their desire to prove their social importance to each other. On the whole, in impolite informal conflict intercourse the conduct of spouses depends a great deal on their social status and education. Low social status married couples in most cases do not control their emotions, do not think about the conflict consequences, do not try to keep a wife (husband) away from undesirable stresses. In some occasions high social status married couples were characteristic of arrogance, snobbery, scorn, that resulted in aggressive verbal conduct during a conflict. Impolite informal conflict cooperation between brothers and sisters is also characteristic of high emotionality degree. Collocutors do not hide their negative feelings and emotions, are not afraid to talk unpleasant, rough and abusive things. At prosodic level it is expressed by high volume and quick speech tempo, as communication participants speak very quickly; although their speech slows down on semantically and emphatically important areas of the dialogue, i. e. semantically and emphatically important remarks are foregrounded via their prolonging. The conducted research enabled the followings conclusions: English informal conflict dialogiсal discourse is characteristic of using verbal aggression techniques; foul, sometimes even taboo, language; simple syntactic constructions; ellipsis; direct imperative constructions. At prosodic level distinctive features of informal conflict dialogues can be named rapid tempo (often with a tendency to normal), high volume, wide voice range, use of the broken descending scale and the high-falling nuclear tone. The collocutor’s conduct in conflict communication depends a great deal on their social status, education and politeness.
Опис
Ключові слова
ввічливість, неввічливість, ввічливий неформальний конфліктний діалогічний дискурс, неввічливий неформальний конфліктний діалогічний дискурс, politeness, impoliteness, polite informal conflict dialogiсal discourse, impolite informal conflict dialogiсal discourse
Бібліографічний опис
Записки з романо-германської філології = Writings in Romance-Germanic Philology