LTSER platforms as a place-based transdisciplinary research infrastructure: learning landscape approach through evaluation

dc.contributor.authorAngelstam, P.
dc.contributor.authorManton, M.
dc.contributor.authorElbakidze, M.
dc.contributor.authorMedinets, Sergiy V.
dc.contributor.authorBretagnolle, V.
dc.contributor.authorМедінець, Сергій Володимирович
dc.contributor.authorМединец, Сергей Владимирович
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-15T10:11:18Z
dc.date.available2020-09-15T10:11:18Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractContext Place-based transdisciplinary research involves multiple academic disciplines and non-academic actors. Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research (LTSER) platform is one concept with * 80 initiatives globally. Objectives As an exercise in learning through evaluation we audited (1) the siting, construction and maintenance of individual LTSER platforms, and (2) them as a distributed infrastructure for place-based transdisciplinary research with focus on the European continent. Methods First, we defined a normative model for ideal performance at both platform and network levels. Second, four surveys were sent out to the 67 selfreported LTSER platforms officially listed at the end of 2016. Third, with a focus on the network level, we analyzed the spatial distribution of both long-term ecological monitoring sites within LTSER platforms, and LTSER platforms across the European continent. Fourth, narrative biographies of 18 platforms in different stages of development were analyzed. Results While the siting of LTSER platforms represented biogeographical regions well, variations in land use history and democratic governance were not well represented. Platform construction was based on 2.1ecological monitoring sites, with 72% ecosystem and 28% social system research. Maintenance of a platform required three to five staff members, focused mostly on ecosystem research, was based mainly on national funding, and had 1–2 years of future funding secured. Networking with other landscape approach concepts was common. Conclusions Individually, and as a network, LTSER platforms have good potential for transdisciplinary knowledge production and learning about sustainability challenges. To improve the range of variation of Pan-European social–ecological systems we encourage interfacing with other landscape approach concepts.uk_UA
dc.identifier.citationLandscape Ecology. P. 1461-1484.uk_UA
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0737-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.onu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/28594
dc.language.isoenuk_UA
dc.relation.ispartofseriesV. 34.
dc.subjectEurope. Landscape approach. Learning through evaluation. Social–ecological system. Stakeholder engagement. Transdisciplinary research.uk_UA
dc.titleLTSER platforms as a place-based transdisciplinary research infrastructure: learning landscape approach through evaluationuk_UA
dc.typeArticleuk_UA
Файли
Контейнер файлів
Зараз показуємо 1 - 1 з 1
Ескіз недоступний
Назва:
3 Angelstam et al., 2019 (Ilter,Medinets).pdf
Розмір:
210.45 KB
Формат:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Опис:
Ліцензійна угода
Зараз показуємо 1 - 1 з 1
Ескіз недоступний
Назва:
license.txt
Розмір:
1.71 KB
Формат:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Опис: