Raikhert, Kostiantyn V.Райхерт, Костянтин Вільгельмович2024-12-162024-12-162024Raikhert K. Once again about the ternary description language as a non-classical logic / K. Raikhert // XІІ Уйомовські читання (2024) [Електронний ресурс] : матеріали Наук. читань пам’яті Авеніра Уйомова / упоряд. і ред. К. В. Райхерт. – Електрон. текст. дані (1 файл : 0,9 МБ). – Одеса : Одес. нац. ун-т ім. І. І. Мечникова, 2024. – С. 50–51.978-966-186-331-5https://dspace.onu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/40127When it comes to the criteria for distinguishing classical logic from non-classical logic, the following criteria are usually mentioned (see: [2, p. 30]) 1) weakening or rejection of the laws (principles) of traditional and classical logic (for example, the rejection of the law of the excluded third led to the foundation of intuitionistic logic); 2) extension of the scope of classical logic (for example, John P. Burgess argues that the fact that mathematical logic goes beyond its scope gives rise to various philosophical logics); 3) the struggle with inference (implication, consequence, etc.) (for example, the rejection of some structural rules within the Gentzen calculus led to the creation of substructuralist logics).enternary description languagenon-classical logiclogicArticle