Ранньотрипільське поселення Могильна V та деякі проблеми вивчення крем’яної індустрії енеоліту
Вантажиться...
Файли
Дата
2019
Науковий керівник
Укладач
Редактор
Назва журналу
ISSN
E-ISSN
Назва тому
Видавець
Одеський національний університет імені І. І. Мечникова
Анотація
Стаття присвячена введенню до наукового обігу кремʼяного комп-
лексу нового ранньотрипільського поселення – Могильної V. Кремʼяна
індустрія пам'ятки має деякі важливі особливості, які проливають
світло на природу ранньотрипільської обробки кременя. Зокрема, певна
кількість великих кремінних гальок немісцевого походження, виявлених
на поверхні памʼятки, може свідчити про транспортування сировини
з родовищ у формі конкрецій. Такий спосіб логістичного забезпечення
виготовлення кремінних знарядь, найімовірніше, був необхідною скла-
довою стратегій індустрії кременя на рівні домогосподарства для його
власних потреб (модус 1 трипільської кременеобробки).
The paper presents new data on the long-debated issue of Early Trypillian flint-knapping industry interpretation. The data were obtained during the field-work of 2017-2018 in the site of Mohylna V that was discovered by O.S. Peresunchak in 1998. The settlement is situated in the Central Ukraine, some 200 km to the north of Odessa (Kirovohrad region, Haivoron district, Zhakchik village council), on the long, gently sloping promontory between the river Mohylianka and its unnamed tributary. It is located between two previously known sites of Mohylna III and Mohylna II discovered by M.S. Gasiuk in early 1950-ies and it is the fifth Early Trypillian settlement along the 4-km stretch of the Mohylianka river. Mohylna V yielded abundant surface collection including tens of chipped stone artefacts. The rests of the destroyed pit were investigated by a testtrench. There were many animal bones, burnt clay, potsherds, polished stone tool and large-buttocks female figurine in the pit. The lithic assemblage is microlithic with many regular bladelets and narrow blades made mostly of pebble flint coming from the Southern Buh northern tributaries. Projectiles are represented by the "rhomboid points". They were produced of blades and bladelets by two oblique abrupt retouch truncations. Similar items are known from Early Trypillian sites of Dniester valley and north Moldova. Rhomboid points are fossil directeurs for Early Trypillia-Precucuteni. Many large (up to several kg) flint pebbles were gathered on the site's surface by local inhabitant. They are evidently not brought to the site by natural forces, rather they are manuports. The pebbles resemble the raw material used on-site for flint-knapping but they are barely tested and are mostly intact. Thus, we can deal with practice of flint pebbles "hoarding" activity. The Early Trypillia flintknapping peculiarities have been explained in different ways. The author presented the social interpretation: Early Trypillian industry of flint was developed by autonomous flint-knappers satisfying the needs of their own household. Similar flint approaches (modus 1) were used later in the Middle Trypillia alongside with flint-knapping organized on the level of the community and supracommunal level (modus 2).
The paper presents new data on the long-debated issue of Early Trypillian flint-knapping industry interpretation. The data were obtained during the field-work of 2017-2018 in the site of Mohylna V that was discovered by O.S. Peresunchak in 1998. The settlement is situated in the Central Ukraine, some 200 km to the north of Odessa (Kirovohrad region, Haivoron district, Zhakchik village council), on the long, gently sloping promontory between the river Mohylianka and its unnamed tributary. It is located between two previously known sites of Mohylna III and Mohylna II discovered by M.S. Gasiuk in early 1950-ies and it is the fifth Early Trypillian settlement along the 4-km stretch of the Mohylianka river. Mohylna V yielded abundant surface collection including tens of chipped stone artefacts. The rests of the destroyed pit were investigated by a testtrench. There were many animal bones, burnt clay, potsherds, polished stone tool and large-buttocks female figurine in the pit. The lithic assemblage is microlithic with many regular bladelets and narrow blades made mostly of pebble flint coming from the Southern Buh northern tributaries. Projectiles are represented by the "rhomboid points". They were produced of blades and bladelets by two oblique abrupt retouch truncations. Similar items are known from Early Trypillian sites of Dniester valley and north Moldova. Rhomboid points are fossil directeurs for Early Trypillia-Precucuteni. Many large (up to several kg) flint pebbles were gathered on the site's surface by local inhabitant. They are evidently not brought to the site by natural forces, rather they are manuports. The pebbles resemble the raw material used on-site for flint-knapping but they are barely tested and are mostly intact. Thus, we can deal with practice of flint pebbles "hoarding" activity. The Early Trypillia flintknapping peculiarities have been explained in different ways. The author presented the social interpretation: Early Trypillian industry of flint was developed by autonomous flint-knappers satisfying the needs of their own household. Similar flint approaches (modus 1) were used later in the Middle Trypillia alongside with flint-knapping organized on the level of the community and supracommunal level (modus 2).
Опис
Ключові слова
енеоліт, Трипілля, логістика кременеобробки, стратегії розщеплення, Aeneolithic, Trypillia, flint-knapping logistics, reduction strategies
Бібліографічний опис
Записки історичного факультету = Записки исторического факультета